Aside from these "tender moments", there are other attributes of taurs to consider. I have made an in-depth explanation of the value of taurs on the battlefield. This may sound familiar, but let me explain still:
Taurs would be an invaluable ally, if not expensive to recruit and train, on the battlefield. Let me explain the reasons for this.
The source of this "invaluability" comes from the physical nature of the taur, due to their large and strong bodies.
A. Taurs could take more damage, so they could stay on the battlefield longer than other units.
B. Their large, strong, quadripedal lower body could enable them to carry greater amounts of supplies and could stabilize them when they are using heavy weapons.
In conclusion, the roles that would best suit taurs would be that of heavy assault and/or support* infantry.
*Support infantry would include engineers, medics**, and the classes whose primary purpose is to replenish the supplies of units on the battlefield.
**A word on the role of medic: A taur medic could have a stretcher strapped to their lower bodies in case a unit's wounds are too severe to be mended on the field, and so must be taken to a field hospital.
If I stumbled across her,you think she would love it if I offer to be her traveling companion?
--
I am a Nintendo Elite Gaurdian,I travel to other worlds,I defend them,and I uphold their Traditions and Harmonies.
--
I am a Nintendo Elite Gaurdian,I travel to other worlds,I defend them,and I uphold their Traditions and Harmonies.
--
..... with scarf-wearing crime-deducing otters and blogger hedgehogs in jumpers
--
My light side is like Fox McCloud, my dark side is like Scourge the hedgehog, and i'm crazy like Crash Bandicoot. XD
--
My light side is like Fox McCloud, my dark side is like Scourge the hedgehog, and i'm crazy like Crash Bandicoot. XD
Taurs would be an invaluable ally, if not expensive to recruit and train, on the battlefield. Let me explain the reasons for this.
The source of this "invaluability" comes from the physical nature of the taur, due to their large and strong bodies.
A. Taurs could take more damage, so they could stay on the battlefield longer than other units.
B. Their large, strong, quadripedal lower body could enable them to carry greater amounts of supplies and could stabilize them when they are using heavy weapons.
In conclusion, the roles that would best suit taurs would be that of heavy assault and/or support* infantry.
*Support infantry would include engineers, medics**, and the classes whose primary purpose is to replenish the supplies of units on the battlefield.
**A word on the role of medic: A taur medic could have a stretcher strapped to their lower bodies in case a unit's wounds are too severe to be mended on the field, and so must be taken to a field hospital.
--
Unfähige Idioten!